Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/47341
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrekhlichuk, Pavlo-
dc.contributor.authorGoncharuk-Khomyn, Myroslav-
dc.contributor.authorГончарук-Хомин, Мирослав Юрійовичuk
dc.contributor.authorБрехлічук, Павло Павловичuk
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T05:07:04Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-31T05:07:04Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationBrekhlichuk P., Goncharuk-Khomyn M. Economical treatment-related burden assessment of maxillofacial trauma among Ukrainians patients. / P. P. Brekhlichuk, M.Y. Goncharuk-Khomyn // Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences. 2020. Vol. 19. — P. 1-12.uk
dc.identifier.issn1677-3225-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/47341-
dc.description.abstractAim: Quantitative evaluation of prognostic correspondence between initial maxillofacial traumatic injury assessed by facial injury severity score and maxillofacial injury severity score, treatment cost and duration of hospitalization among Ukrainian patients. Methods: Design of present study was retrospective and based on the medical data of patients hospitalized with signs of maxillofacial trauma. Quantitative assessment of maxillofacial trauma was held with the use of facial injury severity score (FISS) and maxillofacial injury severity score (MFISS). Average treatment cost and hospitalization duration were used as coordinative criteria for economical treatmentrelated burden verification. Results: Levels of correlation between FISS, treatment charges and hospitalization duration were r=0.69 (р<0.05) and r=0.67 (р<0.05) respectively, while analogical correlations for MFISS were 0.74 (р<0.05) and 0.69 respectively (р<0.05). Statistical correspondence between FISS and MFISS scores among study sample reached r=0.71 (р<0.05). Cases with milder maxillofacial trauma types, characterized with initial lower levels of FISS and MFISS scores, demonstrated greater degree of FISS-to-MFISS inter-relation compare to cases with severe maxillofacial trauma. Conclusion: Even though FISS and MFISS scores both demonstrated reliable levels of correlation with hospitalization duration and cost of dental rehabilitation after maxillofacial trauma injury, but MFISS approach characterized by prognostically greater level of statistical relationship with economically related treatment derivates. Moreover, differentiation capabilities of MFISS is relative greater than FISS, since independent grading of separate functional disabilities becomes possible.uk
dc.language.isoenuk
dc.publisherBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciencesuk
dc.relation.ispartofseries19;-
dc.subjectMaxillofacial injuries, Treatment outcome, Cost of illness, Hospitalizationuk
dc.titleEconomical treatment-related burden assessment of maxillofacial trauma among Ukrainians patientsuk
dc.typeTextuk
dc.pubTypeСтаттяuk
Appears in Collections:Наукові публікації кафедри терапевтичної стоматології

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hceccotti,+Braz+J+Oral+Sci-2020v19e209930.pdf317 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.