Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/66547
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorYasinska-Damri, Lyudmyla-
dc.contributor.authorBabichev, Sergii-
dc.contributor.authorLiakh, Igor-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-31T10:17:37Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-31T10:17:37Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-25-
dc.identifier.citationThe development of patients' health monitoring systems based on gene expression data is a very important direction of current bioinformatics. In this instance, the allocation of both differently expressed and mutually correlated gene expression profiles (GEP) which allow monitoring in real-time the patients' health with high accuracy is a very important step of this problem solution. There are various types of similarity metrics to identify the level of GEP proximity. In this research, we compare the Pearson chi-square test and correlation metric to evaluate the gene expression profiles proximity. The evaluation of appropriate metric effectiveness has been executed by applying the object's classification quality criteria such as accuracy, f-score and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). The simulation results have shown that the metric based on Pearson’s phi-square coefficient is significantly effective in comparison with the correlation metric to allocate the mutually similar gene expression profiles and, this metric can be used when the differently expressed and mutually correlated GEP will be extracted using various clustering algorithms. Keywords 1 Gene expression profiles, correlation metric, Pearson’s chi-square test, gene expression profiles classification, classification quality criteriauk
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/66547-
dc.descriptionThe development of patients' health monitoring systems based on gene expression data is a very important direction of current bioinformatics. In this instance, the allocation of both differently expressed and mutually correlated gene expression profiles (GEP) which allow monitoring in real-time the patients' health with high accuracy is a very important step of this problem solution. There are various types of similarity metrics to identify the level of GEP proximity. In this research, we compare the Pearson chi-square test and correlation metric to evaluate the gene expression profiles proximity. The evaluation of appropriate metric effectiveness has been executed by applying the object's classification quality criteria such as accuracy, f-score and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). The simulation results have shown that the metric based on Pearson’s phi-square coefficient is significantly effective in comparison with the correlation metric to allocate the mutually similar gene expression profiles and, this metric can be used when the differently expressed and mutually correlated GEP will be extracted using various clustering algorithms.uk
dc.description.abstractThe development of patients' health monitoring systems based on gene expression data is a very important direction of current bioinformatics. In this instance, the allocation of both differently expressed and mutually correlated gene expression profiles (GEP) which allow monitoring in real-time the patients' health with high accuracy is a very important step of this problem solution. There are various types of similarity metrics to identify the level of GEP proximity. In this research, we compare the Pearson chi-square test and correlation metric to evaluate the gene expression profiles proximity. The evaluation of appropriate metric effectiveness has been executed by applying the object's classification quality criteria such as accuracy, f-score and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). The simulation results have shown that the metric based on Pearson’s phi-square coefficient is significantly effective in comparison with the correlation metric to allocate the mutually similar gene expression profiles and, this metric can be used when the differently expressed and mutually correlated GEP will be extracted using various clustering algorithms.uk
dc.language.isoenuk
dc.publisherInternational Workshop on Intelligent Information Technologies & Systems of Information Securityuk
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComputer Science, Biology;3156-
dc.subjectGene expression profiles, correlation metric, Pearson’s chi-square test, gene expression profiles classification, classification quality criteriauk
dc.subjectGene expression profiles, correlation metric, Pearson’s chi-square test, gene expression profiles classification, classification quality criteriauk
dc.titleComparison Analysis of the Pearson’s Phi-Square Test and Correlation Metric Effectiveness to Form the Subset of Differently Expressed and Mutually Correlated Genesuk
dc.typeTextuk
dc.pubTypeТези до статтіuk
Розташовується у зібраннях:Наукові публікації кафедри інформатики та фізико-математичних дисциплін

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
paper4.pdfStattja950.05 kBAdobe PDFПереглянути/Відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.