Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/73809
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorМихалко, Ярослав Омелянович-
dc.contributor.authorДудіцька, Світлана-
dc.contributor.authorЛариса, Балацька-
dc.contributor.authorФілак, Фелікс Георгійович-
dc.contributor.authorРубцова, Єлізавета Іллівна-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-19T10:21:23Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-19T10:21:23Z-
dc.date.issued2025-04-
dc.identifier.citationAI-driven rehabilitation: evaluation of ChatGPT-4o for generating personalized physical rehabilitation plans in comorbid patients / Y.O. Mykhalko, S. Dyditska. L. Balatska, F. Filak, Y. Rubtsova // Wiadomości Lekarskie Medical Advances. – 2025, – Vol. 78(4). – p. 753-759.uk
dc.identifier.issn0043-5147-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/73809-
dc.description.abstractAim: To evaluate the performance of ChatGPT-4o in creating personalized physical rehabilitation plans for comorbid patients. Materials and Methods: ChatGPT-4o was employed to generate physical rehabilitation plans for 50 clinical cases of comorbid patients. These plans were evaluated independently by two experts according to 6 criteria using a 5-point Likert scale. Experts also classified each plan regarding its suitability for use into 3 categories: “Completely unsuitable for use”, “Suitable for use with corrections”, “Completely suitable for use”. Statistical analysis included the Mann–Whitney U test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and linear weighted Cohen's kappa (kw). The statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: The overall mean score of ChatGPT-4o generated rehabilitation plans was 4.30±0.28 with the highest scores for respiratory and musculoskeletal pathology (4.37±0.36 and 4.33±0.24, respectively). Among the evaluation criteria, the highest indicators were observed for Clinical accuracy and Safety (4.59±0.59 and 4.41±0.71, respectively). 72.00% of the generated plans were classified as “Suitable for use with corrections”. None of the plans were identified as “Completely unsuitable for use”. The agreement percentage ranged from 84% to 90%, ICC values were 0.80-0.86, and overall suitability kw was 0.77. Conclusions: LLM-generated rehabilitation plans show promise as supportive tools in clinical practice, but they are not yet at a stage where they can be implemented without expert review and modification. The high overall inter-rater reliability provides confidence in the evaluation process, while also highlighting areas for improvement in both the LLM's performance and the assessment methodology.uk
dc.language.isoenuk
dc.publisherALUNA Publishinguk
dc.subjectChatGPT-4ouk
dc.subjectlarge language modeluk
dc.subjectperformanceuk
dc.subjectphysical rehabilitationuk
dc.titleAI-driven rehabilitation: evaluation of ChatGPT-4o for generating personalized physical rehabilitation plans in comorbid patientsuk
dc.title.alternativeРеабілітація на основі штучного інтелекту: оцінка ChatGPT-4o для створення персоналізованих планів фізичної реабілітації у пацієнтів з коморбідними захворюваннямиuk
dc.typeTextuk
dc.pubTypeСтаттяuk
Appears in Collections:Наукові публікації кафедри терапії та сімейної медицини

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AI-rehabilitation.pdf4.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.