25 років модерному українському капіталізму?

Abstract

У статті проблему переходу до модерного капіталізму в Україні розглянуто на основі моделі економічної самоорганізації. Здійснено аналіз змісту еволюційних викликів економічного, управлінського та соціального характеру для наздоганяючої трансформаційної економіки України. На основі аналізу динаміки основних соціально-економічних показників зроблено висновок, що в Україні сформувався периферійний капіталізм третьосортного ґатунку при якому геометрично буде зростати обсяг зовнішнього боргу якщо не самоорганізується система господарювання у формі моделі сучасного капіталізму. Ключові слова: капіталізм, соціалізм, економічний ріст, самоорганізація, національна економіка.

In the crucial 1989-1991 Ukrainian society was discussing and evaluating the feasibility of changing the Socialist directive-administra-tive system to a more modern social market system. "The Revolution of Electoral Emotions" in 2004 and "The Revolution of Dignity" show us the deepness of socio-political and socio-economic conflict in Ukraine and that the changes were unsuccessful. In the period of Ukraine`s recent history the reforms were repeatedly declared. However, it is not clear what we have created in the economic and property terms in Ukraine for 25 years: capitalism or feudalism, free society from capital-ist exploitation or a society overloaded with capitalist exploitation. To study the edges of the content of the phase transition from Soviet socialism, that is, state capitalism in the distribution of social and semantic shell, to private entrepreneurship and to search for economic indicators of the quality of transition are the urgent unsolved problems. The aim is to analyze the meaning of the evolutionary challenges of economic, administrative and social measures for the catching up trans-formational Ukrainian economy. The article examines the main charac-teristics of existing basic principles of capitalism in Ukraine: private property, market economy, the propensity for entrepreneurship, personal initiative and entrepreneurship, rational and efficient use of resources and maximization of profits. The analysis of these parameters allowed us to identify the main positive and negative effects of the current economic system in Ukraine. The conclusion is drawn that the nomenclature socialism for the capitalists and the wild feudal-bourgeois political and economic system for employees are cyclically reproduced in Ukraine in the past 25 years. First of all, in terms of public access to government money and resources. There is a low efficiency of the mechanism for informing the market of competing economic agents in Ukraine. The root cause of this situation is that competition and partnership of capitalists (potential producers of goods) tampered with competitive clans for power and access to budgetary resources. Such a "socio-economic" practice was established as an indirect form of feudal and bourgeois nomenclature exploitation by organized clans of their disorganized fellow citizens, which are actually their subjects. Regarding the system of coordinates of the world economy, a third grade peripheral capitalism is formed in Ukraine, at which the amount of external debt will geometrically increase, if a management system in the form of a modern capitalism model won’t be established. Keywords: capitalism, socialism, economic growth, self-organization, national economy.