Епістолярна публіцистика шістдесятників

Abstract

У пропонованій статті здійснено спробу розглянути епістолярну публіцистику шістдесятників крізь призму альтернативного дискурсу 1960‒1980-х років. Проаналізовано та визначено особливості альтернативного дискурсу таборової епістолярної публіцистики, з’ясовано ключові аспекти цього листування. Амплітуда порушуваних проблем та широке коло адресатів листування шістдесятників засвідчує публіцистичність цього епістолярію та є органічним продовженням публіцистичної спадщини дисидентів загалом, а ідейна спрямованість кореспонденцій дає підстави зараховувати їх до альтернативного дискурсу на противагу офіційному (радянському).

In this article the attempt to define the alternative discourse of representatives of the 1960s generation epistolary publicism is made. The genre characteristics of alternative discourse of the camp epistolary publicism of representatives of the 1960s generation are analyzed. Тhe key aspects of the correspondence are clarified. In spide of significant political position ofthesender, one of the main theme of that epistolary publicism are art and literature.The amplitude of th einduced problems and a widerange of addressees of that correspondence show publicistic of this epistolary and continues publicistic heritage of the representatives of the 1960s generation. The historical, literary, artistic and aesthetical peculiarities of this epistolary are educed. The thesis considers the epistolary heritage of the 1960s generation as a continuation of their professional and creative potencies. The letters written by of the 1960s generation prove to be a vivid illustration not only of his anti-Soviet attitude as a literary critic and his craving for the revision of the literary canon of that time, but also of his active social position. It is considered to be the epistolary essays of the sixtiers as the phenomenon of alternative literary criticism. The ideological orientation of the correspondence gives reason to determine them as the alternative discourse in opposition to the official Soviet. The camp epistolary written by representatives of the 1960s generation prove to be a vivid illustration not only of his anti-Soviet attitude as a literary critic and his craving for the revision of the literary canon of that time, but also of his active social position.