Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/36545
Title: | Unconstitutionality of criminal liability for filing inaccurate information in Ukraine: critical legal analyses |
Other Titles: | Inconstitucionalidad de la responsabilidad penal por presentar información inexacta en Ucrania: análisis legales críticos |
Authors: | Vozniuk, Andrii Kamensky, Dmitriy Dudorov, Olexandr Movchan, Roman Andrushko, Andriy |
Keywords: | declaration of unreliable information; public corruption; corruption-related criminal offense; unconstitutionality of the law; rule of law. |
Issue Date: | 2021 |
Publisher: | University of Zulia, Venezuela |
Citation: | Vozniuk A., Kamensky D., Dudorov O., Movchan R., Andrushko A. Unconstitutionality of criminal liability for filing inaccurate information in Ukraine: critical legal analyses // Cuestiones Políticas. – 2021. – Vol. 39, № 69. – P. 133–145. |
Abstract: | The investigation reveals shortcomings in the arguments of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on the recognition of article 366-1 of the Criminal Code as not being in conformity with the Constitution, in terms of: (a) the court’s lack of authority to criminalize socially dangerous acts; (b) lack of argumentation on the absence of social harm in the non-submission of a declaration and in the presentation of inaccurate information; (c) positive foreign experience; (d) conformity of article 366-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine with the principle of the rule of law. The article employs a set of legal research methods, including terminological, systemic-structural, formal-logical, and comparative-legal. It is stressed that: (a) the criminalization of a socially harmful act is a matter for the legislator, not the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, to decide; (b) the decision does not present or refute any argument on the element of social harmfulness relating to the non-submission of a declaration and the declaration of inaccurate information. On the basis of the investigation, it has been concluded that the decision of the Constitutional Court on the recognition of article 366-1 of the Criminal Code does not comply with the Constitution and has not been sufficiently substantiated. |
Description: | DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3969.07 |
Type: | Text |
Publication type: | Стаття |
URI: | https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/36545 |
ISSN: | 2542-3185 |
Appears in Collections: | Наукові публікації кафедри кримінального права та процесу |
Files in This Item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.